Saturday, July 31, 2010

Application for Candidates for the Offices of Representative, Senator and President of the USA

This test must be completed by the candidate [not a staff member] at one time, at a controlled location, without staff around, and with independent proctors. Answer the questions without evasion. Time limit is two hours. The candidate must go through an airport-type full body scan before answering the essay questions. Appropriate official documents must be included with each test. The test will be signed at the end to indicate the candidate's true beliefs are presented within, and he/she will not be permitted crib notes, televisors, or other assistance in answering. All cell phones will be confiscated for the duration of the exam. The answers and documents will be reviewed by an independent group. All answers and copies of documents will be released to the public.


1. Where were you born? Under what circumstances? Who were your grandparents? Answer in detail. Did you go to college? Where and for how long? Did you graduate? [submit a transcript and copy of your diploma; submit an official Birth Certificate, and not a certificate of birth that doesn't mean anything.]

2. What is your view on abortion? Do you believe in infant life or death? Do you blame an innocent child for the circumstances surrounding its conception? Expand your answer and give details. How would you respond to the following?: Abortion is not the murder of a human being. Abortion is the murder of a human being. Euthanasia and assisted suicide are viable actions for a modern society.

3. What is your view on the size and scope of the Federal Government? Give details. Do you believe in unlimited taxes on Americans to finance Congressional mandates? How much is enough for a Federal Debt? Where do you draw the line? How can we best reduce the debt and annual deficit and should we? How do you view pork and earmarks? What is the relationship between the States and the Federal Government?

4. Are you a Socialist or Communist or Liberal or Progressive or Conservative or Libertarian or other term? Give examples of your political experience that shows what your ideology really is and why you believe in it. Provide examples of political positions you have held.

5. What are your qualifications for this office? Be specific in your giving of details. What is your prior political or management experience? How does this qualify you for this new elected office you want? Do you believe that judicious bribery is needed to complete political ends? Where would you be comfortable with such an action.

6. Do you take an oath to protect the Constitution as it is written or as you want it to be? Please be specific and expand on your answer. What are your views on Constitutional amendments?

7. Do you support all parts of the Constitution---including the amendments---as written? What part[s] of the Constitution are you against and not likely to protect? Please expand your answer and give examples. For example, the second Amendment to the Constitution reads: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." How do you understand and support this?

8. What is your position on welfare? Will you help rein in the costs? Will you hold fathers responsible for providing support and not disappearing into the sunset? Will you deny persons the collecting welfare when they don't need it? What is your position on ILLEGAL immigration? [Don't confuse it with legal immigration.] Will you support the necessary protection of our borders and reduce illegal immigration logically?

9. Do you support our troops in all ways at all times? [Disregard what their civilian orders are.] How have you shown your support in the past? What is your total view on the military? Please expand your answers with specific examples.

10. Our founding fathers were religious, and they included God in their writings and documents. They only guaranteed rights in the Constitution. They didn't create them. Do you support God or Atheism in government? The 1st [read: predominate concern] Amendment to the Constitution reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Provide explanations of your beliefs in regard to this Amendment. How does removing crosses from public places, prohibiting school prayer, or banning the use of the word 'God' in political discourse mesh with this 1st Amendment? How do such actions not run afoul of it?

I _________________________ declare that the above answers are true to my beliefs and ideology and make no excuses for them. I have not equivocated or evaded any answer, and I have not simply answered them to best serve my purposes in the upcoming election. And I promise to resign any office I might be in if I ever deviate from this philosophy.

_______________________________________ The signature must be notarized.



Please Note for the Journalists:
The Attitude of candidate when completing the essay questions.
The Length of time taken to complete the essay questions.

Sunday, July 25, 2010

The Deficit That Ate Middle America

*I was watching a health special on Disease Detectives via the Discovery Channel Health the other day. 'Undiagnosed diseases'---actually Hard-to-Diagnose Diseases.' And I was struck by the matter-of-fact statement that the NIH didn't choose to examine or try to diagnose and help a patient if IT DIDN'T THINK IT WOULD BE SUCCESSFUL. In other words, let's not look into illness that subjects our understanding of health matters to too much strain. We go home at five, you know. Is that what we can expect from Government Health-Care? 'Sorry Joe. We don't know what you have and don't think we can find out. So, you'll die in a hospice---but we'll make you comfortable in your bed---with comics and movies, you know.'

And the NIH serves up to three patients a week. Wow!! The glory of it all! All those $billions for this?

It's all these things about health-care that might slip through the understanding of the public conscience these days as we give hoopla to the vastly expensive health-care system proposed by the 'do as little as you can but make the taxpayers [now and in the future] pay for it' mind-think of Obama and pals. Remember, most of the program won't start until 2014---though the taxes and fines start now [which will be spent on other things---and that'll be two years out from the ousting of Obama. So, the Democrats are set to blame all the upcoming ills on the new administration. No wonder they voted yes. They're planning for the future!

*So says Nancy Pelosi as reported by Real Clear Politics: "It injects demand into the economy," Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said of unemployment checks. "It creates jobs faster than almost any other initiative you can name."
Employed Men Wait on line to receive their 'paychecks', called 'Pelosis'
Pelosi calls unemployment checks a "stimulus" that is a "double benefit" helping "those who lost their jobs" and at the same serves as a "job creator" "It's impossible to think of a situation where we would have a country that would say 'we're not going to have unemployment benefits,'" Pelosi said."
*I notice that whenever a non-Liberal paper, position, or action is taken anywhere in sight, the ubiquitous 'critics' are always semi-quoted to attack such a paper, position, or action: such as, 'critics say.'

I believe we should know who the 'critics' are. In many cases, they are radical individuals who have an ax to grind somewhere. The media journalists simply hide all the crazies with a couple of bona-fide people in the catch-all phrase 'critics.'

When the shoe is on the other foot, any critics of a Liberal paper, position, or action are named and identified in detail. Is this a double-standard? Well, you'll never get a journalist to admit it---or any Liberal bias in his/her writing.

*I keep hearing and seeing TV ads for the Democrat's running to be elected Governor of Connecticut. They never mention the Obama administration or the Democrats in general. They claim to be free from 'special interests'---though that term has never has been adequately defined. For Democrats, 'special interests' include anything or anybody not a Liberal. These runners for the Governorship already are beholding to the Democrat/Liberal/Socialist parties, black activist groups, and labor unions---and that means they are bad for any state where they might wield power.

*We need a short essay exam for all wannabes for National political office. To be filled out by the candidate, not his/her staff. [I'm working on a sample now. It'll show up in my blog soon.]

*Between the Obama administration and Liberal judges, our Country may not have long to live. The World's only super power? Not if Obama can help it. His recent releasing of a Yemeni terrorist---with a Liberal judge approval---is just another sign that he doesn't care about America as long as someone somewhere likes him for his action. And, of course, he cannot stand by while a or Muslim is imprisoned for a verified terror act.

*The White House announced a $1.47trillion deficit for this year.
An appropriate tombstone---but with the wrong date. Obama needed another day or two to complete his work.
The White House and the Democrat Congress seem no longer interested in reducing this deficit as in increases our National Debt past $13 trillion. Cost to attend Obama's birthday bash? $30,000 donation to the Democrats. According to Joe Biden: "Biden said now that Wall Street reform is finished and signed into law, the administration could go out and make its political case for its accomplishment." What accomplishment? Near US bankruptcy? $1.4Trillion deficit? $13Trillion National Debt? The ruination of the World's best health-care and society in America? Please Joe explain your accomplishments so the average citizen can understand you. And don't lie about them like you usually do.

*From Joe Biden again: "The vice president said Republicans "are wildly out of step" with popular opinion on a broad range of issues from holding oil companies responsible for cleaning up the spill in the Gulf, to supporting basic regulations that would prevent another meltdown on Wall Street, to extending unemployment insurance to those who lose their jobs." Doesn't a Joe Biden come with ears? So, common sense and a desire to save the economy and the US is "out of touch?" Joe is the epitome of the proverbial snake-oil salesman. When will he stop singing 'What Kind of Fool am I?' at the Congressional All Star Revue?

*The Democrat Congress took the time this year to officially honor golfer Phil Mickelson, the Chicago Blackhawks hockey team, NASCAR driver Jimmy Johnson, the Penn State women's volleyball team, and the 142nd season of the Saratoga race course in New York. By the way, the Congress also spent us into a $1.4Trillion deficit while destroying the economy. And, according to Joe Biden, ' all the Congressional work needed has been finished.' For the next 90 days, the Democrats will be in campaign mode.


*Another revelation about the lies from the Democrats/Liberals/Socialists in the administration and Congress: from 'Times Watch' on Media Research Center' website: "FOX News didn't run a report on the controversy until AFTER Sherrod had resigned under White House pressure and AFTER the NAACP had issued a press release condemning Sherrod. Yet in “For Fired Agriculture Official, Flurry of Apologies and Job Offer,” reported by Sheryl Gay Stolberg, Shaila Dewan, and Brian Stelter, and written by Stolberg, THE TIMES CHOSE TO BLAME a cabal of “right-wing Web sites” and FOX News for fostering the Sherrod scandal which led to her dismissal. As if Fox forced Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to do its right-wing bidding without ever actually running a single story on Sherrod until AFTER her firing, when the point became moot."

Don't you Democrat/Liberal/Socialist/and sometimes Communist adherents ever get tired of lying? Fox News is a fair and balanced Network and reports news. Only its columnists and show hosts provide opinion---and not always Conservative. I've tried to follow the other news networks---even the regular networks---and found them to be so biased to the left, that I couldn't get a fair report out of them. And the TV networks with shows other than news are also spouting leftist principles. Case in point is NBC's 'Law and Order.' It's drifted so far left now, I can't watch it.

Thursday, July 8, 2010

From Right to Left and Back Again

*Now it seems Nancy Pelosi is on the receiving end of protests from both right and left. The right wants her to stop pushing socialism, stop spending money, and re-organize the government on a more responsible fiscal scale. The left [notably, Code Pink] wants more money. No one seems to realize where the money comes from. It's yours and mine! "And we aren't going to take it anymore!" No more spending! At what point do the Democrats/Liberals expect to stop? A deficit of $3 trillion a year? A debt of $25 trillion? Why do these clowns think that throwing money at a problem and more taxation is the way to correct the ills they themselves created? When the Federal Government declares bankruptcy, are we all going to have to appear in court with our $500,000 per family to pay the debt off? When is enough enough to these people?

*Nancy and her Democrat cronies in Congress are shocked! Just shocked! that the people of the Country are against their efforts to destroy our America. I think being a Democrat, Liberal or a Socialist should be grounds for insanity pleas, and we should lock them all up and try to salvage the Country they've laid waste to before there isn't anything left.

As Grandpa Joad once said: "It's our dirt. It ain't no good, but it's ours." Is that to be all that's left of a once strong, vibrant Country once having the singular force for Democracy, Freedom and Protection? Will Obama and friends leave us nothing more than dirt? I can't wait for November when we can partially clean House and Senate. But as many pundits have predicted, the Democrat/Liberals will lie on the campaign trail to take them to a center position to garner votes. Even now, they've geared up frantically to find 'dirt' on their Republican opponents. [He sassed his Grandmother when he was eight! Is that the kind of guy you want as Senator?] And as soon as they win, they move back to radical left and socialism. When is the electorate going to learn? There is no free lunch. All that pork these guys are sending you is coming out of your own pockets and those of your neighbors and all our descendants across the country and yet to be born! And thanks to the Liberals, murder of our unborn children will lead to fewer descendants to pay the bills.

*In answer to those pundits who think we blame Obama 'for not being God', I'd say he might receive some more support if he were just a good 'community organizer.' But I think any job with responsibility is too big for him. Once again, congratulations to the Liberals, Democrats and Obama apologists [with some overlapping] of the Country that are condoning National destruction.

*Ozzie forever? What can be added to this?
"Ozzy Osbourne wants to leave something of value to humanity when he passes away — his body. - The Black Sabbath front man actually wants to donate his body to science. - The reality show star told Contactmusic it's that amazing he's still alive after his hard-partying past. “By all accounts, I'm a medical miracle,” he explained. - Ozzy’s past addictions include alcohol and prescription drugs. - “When I die, I should donate my body to the Natural History Museum. It's all very well going on a bender for a couple of days but mine went on for 40 years. At one point, I was knocking back four bottles of cognac a day, blacking out, coming to again, and carrying on,” Osbourne said. - If the body of the guy who bit the heads off of small animals is of value to science, maybe he should give his brain to PETA."

Perhaps he should just will his body to the worms which would certainly receive a PETA approval---unless they're allergic to tattoo ink and bad taste.

*CNBC "Teens Face Worst Summer Job Market in 41 Years" The article goes on to say that such jobs are being taken by 'older people' [ages 20-24] to supplement their income. Of course the elderly get their pans too for taking these summer jobs to help pay for the Obama tax revolution. What CNBC fails to recognize, of course is the unconscionably high minimum wage. The idea for a minimum wage was to provide some wage floor for INTRODUCTORY jobs, part-time jobs and the such---and NOT for full time workers supporting a family! With the minimum so high, the employers would rather pay for one usually reliable elderly person rather than a couple of spoiled and pampered teens. Blame the Liberal 'spread the wealth' pioneers in America. They're still around.

*Jimmy Carter is out trying to drum up national comment with his speeches about our 'addiction' to oil. There aren't enough windmills even in the imagination to make up for its loss. We need to build more nuclear plants and to drill for oil and gas on land. Up in Alaska, there's plenty of oil to drill for. Only a few people go up there anyway, so why the concern about such a small plot? [Isn't that safer than the Gulf of Mexico?] And we certainly aren't going to give up crops and sugar to generate ethanol. That won't solve the problem. Anyway, what does he want? Windmills on every car?

*BP ran into problems because it was forced to drill in 5,000 feet of water! That's almost a mile. Drilling on land can be better controlled. So if Jimmy wants to save part of his name recognition, he should be pushing for all of the above [including solar panels and coal] to help us. A growing economy needs power---as does the manifestation of our freedom to move around and insure domestic tranquility---so never mind talking about addictions, just release the restrictions on drilling and building nuclear power plants. As long as we don't have the Russians build the latter, we'll be okay.

*Let's see now. The BP well is still a problem. More oil is gushing [something that wouldn't happen if the environmentalists and Obama had let BP drill closer to land in shallower water.] And what has Obama done? Pretty much nothing but talk. He said no to Dutch and English offers of help and who knows how many other countries. He refuses help from Americans. [Hay on the oil has been proven to work, and a bunch of needed equipment lies unused in Main.] He refuses to let the Louisiana Governor do anything to stem the disaster via Coast Guard blockage. Instead of leaving at least BP to cap the gusher, he points fingers and allows his cronies in Congress to yell and point fingers and otherwise gum up the works. He uses the disaster as an excuse to push more socialist laws through the Congress. Yes. That's our Cart---er Obama.

*We seem to be stuck in Afghanistan for a number of reasons. Among other things, the people don't like us, and they often hide the insurgents. Al-Quaeda and the Taliban build and promote various projects for the people to gain their alliance---though the truth is that once in power, they'll destroy those and the people. And the rules of engagement forced on our soldiers gives them little more war authority than the corner crossing guide. [Excuse me, Mr Terrorist, may I shoot at you?]

*Nancy Pelosi is now saying that unemployment benefits create jobs. And she says that in her motherly-teaching mode, as if anything to the contrary is un-American. Sorry Nancy. Your thinking is what is un-American. You cannot in good conscience equate unemployment checks with job creation. One has no effect on the other. If she would stop Congressional spending, put proper safeguards on immigration and health-care, and leave American small businesses alone, she might actually be helping to create jobs.

So what happens? The Democrats and Nancy Pelosi reject Republican compromises when they want the bill to be paid for by spending reductions. "My concern is that the Democrats are more interested in having this issue to demagogue for political gamesmanship than they are in simply passing the benefits extension," said Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, who offered a deal that was rejected by Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. So, naturally without further ado, the Democrats chastised the Republicans for 'opposing' the benefits with Nancy calling them "just cruel" and "contrary to what our country is about.' Then the agonizing Democrats went on vacation with no further action.

*It's so incomprehensible that so many danger spots against the American state exist and continue while Obama and company eat hamburgers for photo ops, play basketball, or go to the golf course. This country needs protection and defense from the invasion from the south, invasion from the east, and dumbing-down of government via the ridiculous American Liberal outlook on the future.

*It's time for Washington to demand changes in the Mexican border activity and upgrade in human rights. Arizona isn't the problem. Inaction in Washington is. It's like a Cancer. If you don't stop it now, it's simply going to grow larger and kill more and more of the American State.

*In reality, it's going to be a long time before this country trusts and elects another black man as President. And even longer before black men and women are appointed to positions of trust such as Attorney General. It's not because they are black, but the Liberal blacks are the deal breakers. Good black men and women abound in this Country, but the Liberals have ruined politics for them. And why? To gain temporary power? To move the Country's government so far left we can't revive it? These current Liberals are a disgrace for the Country that bred them.

God help us all.