Actually, the 'Big O' nomen was first applied to Oscar Robinson, a former NBA star when 'star' was only used to designate true 'stars', and not every player scoring five points in a basketball game.
***
One of the first things the new President did was to appoint Rahm Emmanuel to chief of staff. Emmanuel is a harsh partisan, and his appointment as chief of staff had been previously denied by Obama during the campaign. And of course, we're also supposed to forget his connection with the disgraced Illinois governor, Rod Blagojevich---not to mention Presidential friends and confidants Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers. Naturally, the Obama administration has denied any wrongdoing or connections.
Mark January 20, 2009 as the beginning of the end of America's superpower status. Not only that, but an ailing economy will be given a dose of poison. It's past health will determine how much damage can be done. The Liberals have pulled the wool over the eyes of the electorate majority, and now we're going to see just how much damage the Liberal/Socialists will do to us.
***
Seen in a recent email from my brother:
'PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT
Due to the recent economic crisis, stock market crash, budget cuts,
rising unemployment, unstable world conditions, outsourcing of
business, the cost of insurance, electricity, petroleum and taxes of
all kinds, we regret to advise you that the Light at the End of the
Tunnel has been turned off until further notice.
We apologize for any inconvenience.'
***
Sad to say, apparently a meteorite landed in Westchester County a few months ago with quite a boom. The newspaper article was short and to the point, but the comments had a distinctly juvenile flavor. Virtually all I read were concentrated on the 'Alien vs Earthman' concept. Earth to the newest generations!! Is anyone there?
***
'Excuses' is the major new industry in the 21st Century. True to the Democrat/Liberal way of life, no one is responsible for anything. It's always the other guy, be he a business owner, rich man or woman, Republican or Conservative, or average white male. And that's part of the problem plaguing the new years of the 21st Century. Blame it on Bush. Blame it on Republicans or Conservatives. Run and hide from the truth. Be sure you have an excuse when you're caught. It was drugs, alcohol or national economic poison pills or the racism---which I see mostly in the black community. Surely, these Liberal/Socialists were forced on you? Or did you choose to partake and be sucked into the trap?
***
President Obama says that handing out the AIG bonuses is 'hard to understand.' I find his comment hard to understand. During the campaign numerous voices were raised telling all Americans how Obama lacked the experience and executive know-how to run the country. Being an ego-driven socialist at heart, Obama has added the 'I' to 'run the country' thus creating a phrase 'ruin the country.'
Bonuses are contractual in many companies, and in AIG they're probably going to people who had little or no responsibility for the virtual collapse. And these are just the people needed to bring the company back to health. Thus, if Congress is going to tax them 90%, these people might bolt to other companies who actually appreciate their abilities. Besides, the specific 90% tax is probably unconstitutional. And it is being put into place to cover the Democrat screw-ups, such as Senator Dodd's amendment 'protecting' the bonuses, and the whole spending spree in general. If this is a sign of how the 'government ownership' will be plyed, the free market system is in for a beating.
Is it any coincidence that some Europeans are calling for the demise of the dollar as an International currency? And what is Obama doing while these things are going on? Bowling, picking NCAA brackets, and appearing on a late night comedy-variety show---surprisingly without teleprompters---thus his spoken gaff? He's letting his socialist, tax evading appointees to do the dirty work.
***
Actually, the public should be hopping mad. Not about the AIG bonuses, but against the billions of $$$ of pork in the spending bills. That's the real waste in the economy. Not only are $$$ being sent for pork projects, money is going to socialist groups like ACORN---though Obama and friends claim to never have known the group. Obama worked for them, but he doesn't remember it. Besides, the current spending spree is very ill advised and not going to solve our economic problems---only expand them.
President Obama is not only spending money like a drunken sailor, but he is presiding over the unconstitutional AIG bonus tax; at least $1 trillion in new taxes---notably on the job and economic providers; a huge deficit and public debt because of the poorly structured 'stimulus' bills, and everything else he and his henchmen touch.
It'll be 2010 before we can do anything about this. And in that election we can at least make our voices heard in Congress. But right now, if we got rid of Obama, we'd be stuck with the fumbling ninny, Joe Biden. And after him is screaming mimi Nancy Pelosi, and then the sometimes incoherent socialist Harry Reid---who needs no other introduction. We have to go down the list until we reach Joe the Plumber before we can appoint a reasonable person.
Good luck my friends, it's going to be a rocky future.
Friday, March 20, 2009
Monday, March 9, 2009
The Gold-Twin Random Smoking Mysteries
It appears the made-for-tv-sale coin dealers are back again with their half truths and misleading statements. Case in point is the NCM offer of a 1929 Indian Head Proof for $24.45 delivered. Though the large print says 'Last $5 Indian ever struck by the U.S. Gov't---that is not what you'd be buying. '...Non-legal tender proof is a classic collectible...' Maybe, depending on 
what you're collecting and how smart a collector you are. These are certainly not real coins nor even completely gold. The original $5 Indian coin is 90% pure gold, [100% gold would be unworkably soft] while this 'replica' is only gold plated.
Obama Administration computer system---------------------------->
The term 'proof' is also bandied about. However, much as that would indicate a struck coin proof, this is not the case. Why? Because this is not a U S coin! Furthermore I don't know what the NCM uses for research, but I question the statement that '...With its historic importance, scarce population and unique design, it's no wonder that one of the original 1929 $5 Gold Indians recently sold for $34,100!...' You can get an uncirculated $5 gold Indian [the real McCoy] from the Home Shopping Network for $710, a more realistic price to quote.
Again, the NCM states that '...There is a strict limit of five Proofs per order. Orders will be filled on a first-come, first-served basis...' I found the same 'gold piece' being offered on at least seven other websites for similar prices. And I don't remember any of them limiting the purchases to five or any other number. I don't believe the NCM limitation will be followed. If you have the money, NCM has the product! No real limitation. Just for you, we'll make an exception.
According to my calculations with the current retail price of gold leaf, I've considered one-eighth of a gram of gold leaf per coin. I sent an email to NCM [1/19/09] asking about the gold content, but I haven't heard back yet [3/09/09.] In any case, the bulk-buying cost of an 1/8th gram of gold leaf [1 sheet] would be about $6. So, your '1929 Indian Head Proof' from NCM has about $6 in gold. Although I saw the piece for sale on Ebay for $60 [I also saw numerous inexpensive books selling for $1,000,000 each! A matter of listing order on the database, I suppose], most resales should be much lower than $24.45.
And you can't accept any claims that the piece is uncirculated, because it's not a coin, and it would never be circulated in the first place. So, as I noted in my last essay on silver pieces, 'buy the ['1929 $5 Indian Head Proof'] if you want, but don't buy it for use or investment.'
***
Aren't you sick and tired---as I am---of these tv ads for lawyers? It seems they'll pounce on anything to make a buck. You see, according to the legal profession---like the Liberals---no one is guilty of anything. To the contrary, someone else is always guilty---even if the practice or product in question has been accepted for many years or decades without the dubious advantage of today's Liberal hindsight.
Take cigarettes for an example. Even as a school kid in the fifties, I knew their use would lead to cancer or breathing problems. I didn't need a surgeon general or lawyer to tell me. Everyone I knew who used cigarettes, knew they were dangerous. But their pleasure outweighed the danger, so they continued. And, by the way, I liked Joe Camel and he didn't entice me to buy Camels or any other cigarettes. And I've never seen any positive proof that children were adversely influenced by smokey Joe. I like Popeye, but I don't buy his canned spinach. Nor do I buy Mickey Mouse coloring books.
Now we have court cases awarding millions and billions of dollars to 'aggrieved' parties. If you smoke, you have no business suing the cigarette manufacturers. You knew the danger. Just like we know the danger of driving cars on highways; or hunting; or working in the kitchen; or flying; or entering the military; or riding with a Massachusett's senator on a Saturday night near water.
Life is a continuous flow of danger, and we have to make our ways through it with a minimum of damage to live a long life.
Besides, what the lawyers don't tell you is that they'll take at least a third of your award---if any. So if you win $50,000, you can say good-bye to $15,000 plus the lawyer's expenses. If you win $500,000, you can do the math. And the expenses will suddenly escalate to the lawyer's advantage. Some lawyers will take 40% as a matter of course, so keep your wallets closed.
We have a litigious society simply because the lawyers want it so. And their Liberal cohorts in office continue to provide opportunities for the public to sue everyone else for real or perceived injuries. If you haven't got a case, your lawyer will manufacture one from the flimsiest data he or she can find. All for your benefit? Sometimes I wonder. Meanwhile, resulting prices of our commodities and services will increase to cover the spurious awards---not to mention climbing insurance rates.
Remember, the increasing number of lawyers need more and more litigations to pay their bills and give them lifestyles they think they're entitled to. So, stay in bed and be sure you don't get bed sores.
***
I keep seeing these tv commercials about feeding the poor children of the World, such as 'CCFund'. It usually bothers me when I see these sad stories narrated by overweight people. It seems to me, they should be doing a little sacrificing themselves. Sally Struthers call your office.
***
UScoinnetwork.com has an announcer for the Obama commemorative coins who sounds exactly like Obama. That's no coincidence. It's a clever c'mon to make the coins to have more of a Presidential connection and sound more momentous than they really are.
***
There's a tv advertisement for a to-be-nameless [I don't want the firm suing me!] law firm, you know, one of the millions advertising for mesothelioma cases? One supposed happy client said it all. "They are more than lawyers, they are human beings." So, I guess lawyers are level 1 and humans are level 2?
what you're collecting and how smart a collector you are. These are certainly not real coins nor even completely gold. The original $5 Indian coin is 90% pure gold, [100% gold would be unworkably soft] while this 'replica' is only gold plated.Obama Administration computer system---------------------------->
The term 'proof' is also bandied about. However, much as that would indicate a struck coin proof, this is not the case. Why? Because this is not a U S coin! Furthermore I don't know what the NCM uses for research, but I question the statement that '...With its historic importance, scarce population and unique design, it's no wonder that one of the original 1929 $5 Gold Indians recently sold for $34,100!...' You can get an uncirculated $5 gold Indian [the real McCoy] from the Home Shopping Network for $710, a more realistic price to quote.
Again, the NCM states that '...There is a strict limit of five Proofs per order. Orders will be filled on a first-come, first-served basis...' I found the same 'gold piece' being offered on at least seven other websites for similar prices. And I don't remember any of them limiting the purchases to five or any other number. I don't believe the NCM limitation will be followed. If you have the money, NCM has the product! No real limitation. Just for you, we'll make an exception.
According to my calculations with the current retail price of gold leaf, I've considered one-eighth of a gram of gold leaf per coin. I sent an email to NCM [1/19/09] asking about the gold content, but I haven't heard back yet [3/09/09.] In any case, the bulk-buying cost of an 1/8th gram of gold leaf [1 sheet] would be about $6. So, your '1929 Indian Head Proof' from NCM has about $6 in gold. Although I saw the piece for sale on Ebay for $60 [I also saw numerous inexpensive books selling for $1,000,000 each! A matter of listing order on the database, I suppose], most resales should be much lower than $24.45.
And you can't accept any claims that the piece is uncirculated, because it's not a coin, and it would never be circulated in the first place. So, as I noted in my last essay on silver pieces, 'buy the ['1929 $5 Indian Head Proof'] if you want, but don't buy it for use or investment.'
***
Aren't you sick and tired---as I am---of these tv ads for lawyers? It seems they'll pounce on anything to make a buck. You see, according to the legal profession---like the Liberals---no one is guilty of anything. To the contrary, someone else is always guilty---even if the practice or product in question has been accepted for many years or decades without the dubious advantage of today's Liberal hindsight.
Take cigarettes for an example. Even as a school kid in the fifties, I knew their use would lead to cancer or breathing problems. I didn't need a surgeon general or lawyer to tell me. Everyone I knew who used cigarettes, knew they were dangerous. But their pleasure outweighed the danger, so they continued. And, by the way, I liked Joe Camel and he didn't entice me to buy Camels or any other cigarettes. And I've never seen any positive proof that children were adversely influenced by smokey Joe. I like Popeye, but I don't buy his canned spinach. Nor do I buy Mickey Mouse coloring books.
Now we have court cases awarding millions and billions of dollars to 'aggrieved' parties. If you smoke, you have no business suing the cigarette manufacturers. You knew the danger. Just like we know the danger of driving cars on highways; or hunting; or working in the kitchen; or flying; or entering the military; or riding with a Massachusett's senator on a Saturday night near water.
Life is a continuous flow of danger, and we have to make our ways through it with a minimum of damage to live a long life.
Besides, what the lawyers don't tell you is that they'll take at least a third of your award---if any. So if you win $50,000, you can say good-bye to $15,000 plus the lawyer's expenses. If you win $500,000, you can do the math. And the expenses will suddenly escalate to the lawyer's advantage. Some lawyers will take 40% as a matter of course, so keep your wallets closed.
We have a litigious society simply because the lawyers want it so. And their Liberal cohorts in office continue to provide opportunities for the public to sue everyone else for real or perceived injuries. If you haven't got a case, your lawyer will manufacture one from the flimsiest data he or she can find. All for your benefit? Sometimes I wonder. Meanwhile, resulting prices of our commodities and services will increase to cover the spurious awards---not to mention climbing insurance rates.
Remember, the increasing number of lawyers need more and more litigations to pay their bills and give them lifestyles they think they're entitled to. So, stay in bed and be sure you don't get bed sores.
***
I keep seeing these tv commercials about feeding the poor children of the World, such as 'CCFund'. It usually bothers me when I see these sad stories narrated by overweight people. It seems to me, they should be doing a little sacrificing themselves. Sally Struthers call your office.
***
UScoinnetwork.com has an announcer for the Obama commemorative coins who sounds exactly like Obama. That's no coincidence. It's a clever c'mon to make the coins to have more of a Presidential connection and sound more momentous than they really are.
***
There's a tv advertisement for a to-be-nameless [I don't want the firm suing me!] law firm, you know, one of the millions advertising for mesothelioma cases? One supposed happy client said it all. "They are more than lawyers, they are human beings." So, I guess lawyers are level 1 and humans are level 2?
Sunday, March 1, 2009
Drinking the Kool-Aid
I was in a group recently, and several members were extolling the hope and expectations of the Obama administration. One was so vehement about her support of Obama, I told her she's either still mesmerized by Obamas speaking or else she just drank the 'Kool-Aid.' I thought that was a fair comment to a Liberal who thinks as Obama does, what with the tremendous, pork-filled expenditure authorization and the poor picks for the cabinet and so much more.
So, in her Liberal way, she immediately attacked me for making a racist statement. Racist? Where? When? How? Apparently, my mention of 'Kool-Aid' drinking was racist to her. I'm not surprised that a Liberal would trot out the race card to avoid talking about something substantive---like where are we going with this $12 trillion dollar debt? Why do Liberals instinctively throw money at a problem? There's no substantial economic stimulus in the so-called stimulus bill, on top of the bailout, and now with talks about a second stimulus bill.
Shades of Calumet Farm and the trouble created by Bill Lunday in the 1980s! A once successful, glorious and profitable stable was transformed by his excess living and poor management to bankruptcy and almost to liquidation. Is that what we can foresee from the Obama admistration and Democrat Congress?
By the way, the 'Kool-Aid' reference harkens back to the Jonesboro tragedy and later use by newscasters, and commentators in general. According to Wordspy.com drinking the 'Kool-Aid' is "to become a firm believer in something; to accept an argument or philosophy wholeheartedly or blindly."
That's the usual usage of the term. It's the one I was using. And you Liberals out there who continually believe that every word out of a Conservative person's mouth amounts to racism better get your minds cleaned of all the hogwash.
***
A few days ago, the new US Attorney General, Eric Holder, called us all cowards because he believes we don't talk enough about race to each other. Well, that's not surprising when you consider that most of us can't talk about race because the Liberals are out there calling everybody racists---willy nilly. And to add insult to injury, you Liberals are constantly lying---yes lying!---to others, Liberal and Conservative, about the truth regarding race relationships over the years. And we're talking here of blacks and whites, since the current Attorney General is black and most of us are white. The Liberal purpose? Why to get black votes, of course.
***
One vocal black woman is Frances Rice, head of the Black Republican Association. She recently gave an interview that can be seen and heard on 'You Tube.' She's saying things that many of us already know. And it doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure this stuff out either. Simple understanding of history---true history and not the stuff the Liberals try to foist off on everybody!---will easily lead you to the truth about race relations.
It's well worth going to 'You Tube' and listening to this interview. It may open your eyes. Below are the links to the interview [it's in three parts], or at least I think they may follow. Sometimes, I can't get a link into these blogs. If nothing shows, then go to "You Tube' and enter her name, Frances Rice. That should work.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YdEmn7IYOg&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2l8NT3XfZE&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdNbO4RCj0I&feature=related
***
So, in her Liberal way, she immediately attacked me for making a racist statement. Racist? Where? When? How? Apparently, my mention of 'Kool-Aid' drinking was racist to her. I'm not surprised that a Liberal would trot out the race card to avoid talking about something substantive---like where are we going with this $12 trillion dollar debt? Why do Liberals instinctively throw money at a problem? There's no substantial economic stimulus in the so-called stimulus bill, on top of the bailout, and now with talks about a second stimulus bill.
Shades of Calumet Farm and the trouble created by Bill Lunday in the 1980s! A once successful, glorious and profitable stable was transformed by his excess living and poor management to bankruptcy and almost to liquidation. Is that what we can foresee from the Obama admistration and Democrat Congress?
By the way, the 'Kool-Aid' reference harkens back to the Jonesboro tragedy and later use by newscasters, and commentators in general. According to Wordspy.com drinking the 'Kool-Aid' is "to become a firm believer in something; to accept an argument or philosophy wholeheartedly or blindly."
That's the usual usage of the term. It's the one I was using. And you Liberals out there who continually believe that every word out of a Conservative person's mouth amounts to racism better get your minds cleaned of all the hogwash.
***
A few days ago, the new US Attorney General, Eric Holder, called us all cowards because he believes we don't talk enough about race to each other. Well, that's not surprising when you consider that most of us can't talk about race because the Liberals are out there calling everybody racists---willy nilly. And to add insult to injury, you Liberals are constantly lying---yes lying!---to others, Liberal and Conservative, about the truth regarding race relationships over the years. And we're talking here of blacks and whites, since the current Attorney General is black and most of us are white. The Liberal purpose? Why to get black votes, of course.
***
One vocal black woman is Frances Rice, head of the Black Republican Association. She recently gave an interview that can be seen and heard on 'You Tube.' She's saying things that many of us already know. And it doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure this stuff out either. Simple understanding of history---true history and not the stuff the Liberals try to foist off on everybody!---will easily lead you to the truth about race relations.
It's well worth going to 'You Tube' and listening to this interview. It may open your eyes. Below are the links to the interview [it's in three parts], or at least I think they may follow. Sometimes, I can't get a link into these blogs. If nothing shows, then go to "You Tube' and enter her name, Frances Rice. That should work.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YdEmn7IYOg&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2l8NT3XfZE&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdNbO4RCj0I&feature=related
***
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)